History
  • No items yet
midpage
Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. Bird
19 Ga. App. 808
Ga. Ct. App.
1917
Check Treatment
Bloodworth, J.

1. “This court has no power to determine that the preponderance of the evidence is in favor of one party to a cause rather than the other, or to award a new trial in any case where there is any evidence sufficient to support the verdict.” Bunn v. Hargraves, 3 Ga. App. 518 (60 S. E. 223); Wilson v. Barnard, 10 Ga. App. 90 (8), 99 (72 S. E. 943) ; Randall v. Bell, 12 Ga. App. 614 (77 S. E. 1132).

2. The trial judge did not err either in admitting the testimony complained of or in refusing a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, P. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Phillips-Boyd Publishing Co. v. Bird
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Apr 25, 1917
Citation: 19 Ga. App. 808
Docket Number: 8062
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.