decided that the service of the subpoena was regular; and that as it was not pretended by the defendant that he had a legal and meritorious defence to the suit of which he had been deprived in consequence of his situation, the vice chancellor was right in refusing to open the default and to vacate the decree.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
