History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. v. Lifescan, Inc.
2:16-cv-00564
D. Nev.
Jun 6, 2017
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 Gregory L. Diskant (admitted

Eugene M. Gelernter (admitted YLER LLP

1133 Avenue of the Americas

Phone: (212) 336-2000

Fax: (212) 336-2222

Email: gldiskant@pbwt.com

emgelernter@pbwt.com

Charles D. Hoffmann (admitted

Sean R. Marshall (admitted

Phone: (212) 851-8403

Fax: (646) 741-4502

Email: charlie@hmscounsel.com

sean@hmscounsel.com

Kelly A. Evans (NV Bar #7691)

Chad R. Fears (NV Bar #6970) .

Suite 1130

Phone: (702) 805-0290

Fax: (702) 805-0291

Email: kevans@efstriallaw.com

cfears@efstriallaw.com

LifeScan Scotland, Ltd.; and Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA PHARMA TECH SOLUTIONS, INC. and DECISION IT CORP.,

Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:16-cv-00564-RFB-PAL

vs. STIPULATION AND ORDER

LIFESCAN, INC., LIFESCAN SCOTLAND, LTD. and JOHNSON AND JOHNSON,

Defendants. *2

WHEREAS Plaintiffs Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. and Decision IT Corp. (collectively “Pharma Tech”) have alleged in this action, inter alia, that Defendants LifeScan Inc., LifeScan Scotland, Ltd. and Johnson & Johnson (collectively, “LifeScan”) literally infringe U.S. Patent Nos. 6,153,069 (“the ’069 patent”) and 6,413,411 (“the ’411 patent”) (collectively, the “Asserted Patents”) by making, using, importing, exporting, offering to sell, and selling OneTouch Ultra blood glucose test strips and meters (the “Accused Products”); and

WHEREAS LifeScan has disputed this allegation; and

WHEREAS LifeScan has provided Pharma Tech with access to documentation showing the operation of the Accused Products; and

WHEREAS Pharma Tech has reviewed this documentation and has concluded that LifeScan does not literally infringe the Asserted Patents by making, using, importing, exporting, offering to sell, or selling the Accused Products; and

WHEREAS Pharma Tech now wishes to dismiss its allegations of literal infringement; NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, AGREED, AND ORDERED that Pharma Tech’s claims against LifeScan of literal infringement of all claims of the ’069 patent and all claims of the ’411 patent ARE DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

/ / /

/ / /

/ / /

– 1 –

*3 For clarity and the avoidance of doubt, this Stipulation and Order does not in any way affect Pharma Tech’s claim that LifeScan infringes the ’411 patent and the ’069 patent under the doctrine of equivalents.

Dated: June 6, 2017 . F OX R OTHSCHILD LLP /s/ Chad R. Fears /s/ William Rudy Chad R. Fears, NV Bar No. 6970 William Rudy ( pro hac vice ) 1225 17 th St., Ste. 2200 Kelly A. Evans, NV Bar No. 7691 Denver, CO 80202 Suite 1130

Gregory Diskant (

Eugene M. Gelernter ( YLER LLP

1133 Avenue of the Americas

Charles D. Hoffmann ( Sean R. Marshall ( Attorneys for Plaintiffs Pharma Tech

LifeScan Scotland, Ltd.; and Johnson & Solutions, Inc. and Decision IT Corp. Johnson IT IS SO ORDERED: ____________________________

Honorable Richard F. Boulware, II United States District Judge Dated: June ______, 2017 6

– 2 –

Case Details

Case Name: Pharma Tech Solutions, Inc. v. Lifescan, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, D. Nevada
Date Published: Jun 6, 2017
Docket Number: 2:16-cv-00564
Court Abbreviation: D. Nev.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.