midpage

Phaneuf v. StatePhaneuf v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida
Mar 8, 1990
No. 89-66
Versions:557 So. 2d 685
1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372
1990 WL 20383
GRIFFIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a guideline departure sentence. The reasons given for de*686parture were based on probation violations and are invalid. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Ree v. State, 14 F.L.W. 565, — So.2d - (Fla. Nov. 16, 1989). Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.

Sentence VACATED; case REMANDED for resentencing.

COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Phaneuf v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Mar 8, 1990
Citations: 557 So. 2d 685; 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372; 1990 WL 20383; No. 89-66
Docket Number: No. 89-66
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In