112 Mich. 614 | Mich. | 1897
(after stating the facts). The theory of the defendant is that there could be no recovery upon an implied contract, for the reason that plaintiff was paid a full and specified sum per week for board, and that the jury should have been instructed that they must find for the defendant unless an express contract to pay for nursing was proven. The court might with propriety have
Errors are assigned upon the admission of testimony. We find no errors in these rulings, and do not discuss them, because they are not of sufficient importance to the profession.
Judgment affirmed.