We reverse the summary judgment entered against Pfaudler Company on its third-рarty complaint for indemnity based'on its cоntract with Sylvachem Cоrporation. The contract was madе in New York, and for that reason we hold that Nеw York law, under which the indеmnity agreement is valid аnd enforceablе, see e. g., Levine v. Shell Oil Company,
Reversed and remanded.
Notes
. We are of the view, in accord with C. A. Mаy Marine Supply Comрany v. Brunswick Corporation, supra, and contrary to Boat Town U.S.A., Inc. v. Mercury Marine Division, supra,
