History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pettit v. State
28 Tex. Ct. App. 240
| Tex. App. | 1889
|
Check Treatment
Willson, Judge.

In view of the evidence adduced the jury should have been instructed in relation to a mistake of fact. If the defendant, at the time he practiced medicine as charged against him, labored under the mistake that his certificate had been filed for record in Van Zandt County, and if said mistake did not arise from a want of proper care on his part, he was entitled to be acquitted. Penal Code, arts. 45 and 46.' This issue was clearly presented by the evidence. The trial court did not submit it to the jury, and refused special instructions thereon requested by defendant, and defendant reserved proper bills of exception to the errors.

The judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and Remanded.

Judges all present and concurring.

Case Details

Case Name: Pettit v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Dec 7, 1889
Citation: 28 Tex. Ct. App. 240
Docket Number: No. 3206
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.