History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peterson v. Roberts
100 P.2d 431
Okla.
1940
Check Treatment

This action involves the constitutionality of Senate Bill No. 186 of the 17th Legislature (art. 22, ch. 65, S. L. 1939, 68 Okla. St. Ann. § 184e et *Page 497 seq.), authorizing the reduction of assessment for prior years. The act is in all material respects identical with an act passed by the Legislature in 1937, which was held unconstitutional by this court in Ivester v. State (1938)183 Okla. 519, 83 P.2d 193. The Legislature, in effect, re-enacted the bill after this court had held it unconstitutional.

Plaintiff sought a writ of mandamus, which the trial court denied, and plaintiff brings this appeal. It is contended that this act is materially different from the one previously held unconstitutional and that the decision in the Ivester Case should be overruled. The contentions made with reference to the distinctions between the 1937 and 1939 acts are not of sufficient merit to justify any comment, and we reaffirm our decision in the Ivester Case.

Judgment affirmed.

RILEY, CORN, GIBSON, and DANNER, JJ., concur. WELCH, V. C. J., dissents. OSBORN and DAVISON, JJ., absent. BAYLESS, C. J., not participating.

Case Details

Case Name: Peterson v. Roberts
Court Name: Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Date Published: Jan 30, 1940
Citation: 100 P.2d 431
Docket Number: No. 29368.
Court Abbreviation: Okla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.