History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peterson v. Reyna
920 S.W.2d 288
Tex.
1996
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

This is a personal injury action. Petitioner, Sandra Peterson, appeals from the court of appeals’ judgment affirming the trial court’s judgment in her favor. We grant writ of error and modify the court of appeals’ judgment to delete the assessment of costs against petitioner. Because the petitioner satisfied the requirements set out in Tex. R.App.P. 40(a)(3) to prosecute the appeal as an indigent, all parties agree that the court of appeals erred in its assessment of costs against her. As to the remainder of the court of appeals’ judgment, for which there is no opinion of the court because each justice on the panel submitted a separate opinion, there is “no error which requires reversal, or which is of such importance to the jurisprudence of the State as to require correction.” Tex.R.App.P. 133(a).

Case Details

Case Name: Peterson v. Reyna
Court Name: Texas Supreme Court
Date Published: Apr 12, 1996
Citation: 920 S.W.2d 288
Docket Number: 95-1123
Court Abbreviation: Tex.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.