History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peterson v. Dunn
24 N.Y.S.2d 134
N.Y. App. Div.
1940
Check Treatment

Judgment and order affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concur, except Dowling and Harris, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that the court erred in not submitting to the jury the question of defendant’s liability for injuries resulting to plaintiff when defendant’s car ran over him. (The judgment is for defendant in an automobile negligence action. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and McCurn, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: Peterson v. Dunn
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Nov 8, 1940
Citation: 24 N.Y.S.2d 134
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.