81 P. 574 | Or. | 1905
delivered the opinion of the court.
To support the decree of the court below the defendant contends: (1) That evidence to prove a contract by Grenot to protect the plaintiff from the Thompson and Josephson judgmentliens was incompetent and inadmissible, because it tended to vary or contradict a written contract; (2) that the indemnity contract was not in writing, and therefore void under the statute of frauds; and (3) the suit is barred by the statute of limitations.
The decree of the court will be reversed, and one entered here in favor of the plaintiff. Reversed.