Peters v. StatePeters v. State
On July 1,1998, defendant Carlos Peters was convicted of violating the Georgia Controlled Substances Act. Defendant Peters filed a motion for new trial 34 days later on August 4, 1998, which was beyond the 30-day requirement set by
Since no election to first file a timely direct appeal was employed, the 30-day time requirement set by
purported motion for new trial was not filed within 30 days as required by the Appellate Practice Act (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 30; Code Ann. § 70-301[, nowOCGA § 5-5-40 (a) ]), was thus void and of no effect, and therefore did not toll the time for filing the notice of appeal under the Appellate Practice Act (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18, 21; Code Ann. § 6-803 [, nowOCGA § 5-6-38 (a) ]).
Johnson v. State,
In accordance with
Rowland v. State,
If, upon defendant Peters’ application for out-of-time appeal, it be established to the trial court’s satisfaction that the appellate procedural deficiency was due to appellate counsel’s failure to perform routine duties, defendant Peters is entitled to an out-of-time appeal. The trial court should appoint another attorney for you if you cannot pay for one. If the trial court grants an out-of-time appeal, you will have 30 days from the grant in which to file a notice of appeal. If the trial court denies your request for an out-of-time appeal, you may appeal that denial to this Court within 30 days of the trial court’s decision.
The Clerk of the Court of Appeals of Georgia is directed to send a
*626
copy of this opinion to defendant Peters, as well as to defendant Peters’ current appellate counsel with direction that appellate counsel also send a copy of the opinion to defendant Peters.
Zachery v. State,
Appeal dismissed.