Peters v. City of White PlainsPeters v. City of White Plains
Ordered that order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff Eric Peters alleged that he slipped and fell on a ramp in a public parking garage leased and maintained by the
Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Charter requirement that there be prior written notice of a defect in a parking garage in order to maintain an action against the City complies with
The defendants met their burden of establishing entitlement to summary judgment by demonstrating that the City did not have prior written notice of the defects alleged by the plaintiffs. In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to submit evidence that raised a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, summary judgment was properly awarded to the defendants (see Zuckerman v City of New York, 49 NY2d 557 [1980]).
Prudenti, P.J., Dillon, Eng and Leventhal, JJ., concur.