History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peter Kleidman v. Judge Alison MacKenzie
2:25-cv-03821
C.D. Cal.
Nov 15, 2025
Check Treatment
Docket

PETER KLEIDMAN v. JUDGE ALISON MACKENZIE

No. 2:25-cv-03821-JLS (JDE)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION

November 15, 2025

Document 29 Filed 11/15/25 Page 1 of 2 Page ID #:227

ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the records on file, including the operative First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 14, “FAC“) filed by Peter Kleidman (“Plaintiff“), the Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. 16, “Motion“) filed by Defendant Judge Alison MacKenzie (“Defendant“), all papers supporting and opposing the Motion, the Report and Recommendation of the assigned magistrate judge (Dkt. 27, “Report“), and Plaintiff‘s Objection to the Report (Dkt. 28).

The Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendation of the magistrate judge.

/ / /

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action without prejudice.

Dated: November 15, 2025

HON. JOSEPHINE L. STATON

United States District Judge

Case Details

Case Name: Peter Kleidman v. Judge Alison MacKenzie
Court Name: District Court, C.D. California
Date Published: Nov 15, 2025
Citation: 2:25-cv-03821
Docket Number: 2:25-cv-03821
Court Abbreviation: C.D. Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.