155 Ga. App. 106 | Ga. Ct. App. | 1980
Person and a co-defendant, Thomas, were convicted in the Superior Court of Clarke County of possessing marijuana in violation
Evidence presented at trial discloses that early on the morning of September 2,1978 police entered a motel room in Athens, Georgia which had been rented by appellant for himself, Thomas and their two dates, who had come to Athens from Atlanta for a party. When the police entered the room appellant was lying on one bed and Thomas was lying on the other bed. Their two dates, who had reported Thomas and appellant to the police, were not present. Police found a paper grocery sack containing two plastic bags and several small manila envelopes under the bed occupied by Thomas; a separate small manila envelope on the floor equi-distant between the two beds; and a brown vinyl pouch; there was no testimony as to where the pouch was located, or what, if anything, it contained. The two plastic bags and several of the small manila envelopes inside the grocery sack, as well as the small manila envelope on the floor, contained a green leafy substance, later identified as marijuana. Both Thomas and appellant disclaimed any knowledge of the marijuana, and the state witnesses, including the two girls who had accompanied Thomas and appellant, testified that they had never seen Person with any marijuana in his possession and had not seen him smoke any marijuana. Debra Palmer, the girl who accompanied Thomas to Athens, testified that prior to leaving Atlanta Thomas had put a packet of marijuana “reefers” down the front of her blouse; she identified one of the packages found in the motel room as the same packet of marijuana Thomas had given her. Based on this evidence both Thomas and appellant were convicted of the unlawful possession of marijuana.
This court affirmed the conviction of Thomas, who enumerated the same errors as appellant here. Thomas v. State, 153 Ga. App. 686 (266 SE2d 335) (1980). However, each case must be decided on its own merits and we find this case distinguishable from Thomas. In Thomas there was direct evidence connecting that defendant with some of the marijuana found in the room and additionally, the majority of the marijuana was found under the bed being used by Thomas. Thus the only evidence, all circumstantial, connecting appellant to the marijuana was that he was in the same room and the room had been rented in the name of “John Persons” (appellant’s first name is Danny). In our opinion, this is not sufficient to sustain Person’s conviction. Our court has held consistently that “[m]erely finding contraband on premises occupied by a defendant is not sufficient to support a conviction if it affirmatively appears from the evidence that persons other than the defendant had equal
Judgment reversed.