History
  • No items yet
midpage
Perry v. Young
444 So. 2d 553
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1984
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

Upon review of the record we conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by competent, substantial evidence and that any error made by the court in stating the grounds for its decision was harmless. See generally, Servidone Construction Corp. v. Southeast Materials Corp., 421 So.2d 695 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) and In re Estate of Hammermann, 387 So.2d 409 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980). Accordingly, the judgment is hereby affirmed.

ANSTEAD, C.J., and BERANEK and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Perry v. Young
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Jan 25, 1984
Citation: 444 So. 2d 553
Docket Number: No. 83-1106
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.