Perrine v. Perrine
65 N.J. Eq. 719
N.J.
1903
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from should be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion of Vice-Chancellor Pitney, delivered in the court of chancery, and reported in 18 Dick. Ch. Rep. 483.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Van Syckel, Garrison, Garretson, Bogert, Voori-iees, Vroom — 7. For reversal — Dixon, Fort, Hendrickson, Swayze, Vredenburgi-i — 5.