Pero v. Corley

May 7, 1924
Versions:100 So. 748
87 Fla. 448
Per Curiam.

The declaration herein does not wholly fail to state a cause of action, therefore the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. See Wertz v. Tampa Electric Co., 78 Fla. 405, 83 South. Rep. 270; Peterson v. Oscar Daniels Co., 83 Fla. 29, 90 South. Rep. 621.

The judgment rendered on the demurrer is reversed.

Whitfield, P. J., and West and Terrell, J. J., concur..