History
  • No items yet
midpage
Perma-Liner Industries, LLC v. D'Hulster
8:21-cv-00715
M.D. Fla.
Mar 14, 2022
Check Treatment
Docket
Case Information

*1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

PERMA-LINER INDUSTRIES, LLC,

Plaintiff, v. Case No: 8:21-cv-715-CEH-TGW GERALD D’HULSTER,

Defendant.

/ O R D E R

This cause comes before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation filed by Magistrate Judge Thomas G. Wilson on February 9, 2022 (Doc. 117).

In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant-in-part and deny-in-part Defendant Gerald D’Hulster’s Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Verified Complaint for Injunctive Relief and Damages (Doc. 76). Doc. 117 at 24. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court grant the Motion to Dismiss only to the extent that Count VII, which alleges tortious interference with prospective business relationships, be dismissed, without prejudice, to Plaintiff’s right to amend that claim. Id. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court otherwise deny the Motion to Dismiss. Id.

All parties were furnished copies of the Report and Recommendation and were afforded the opportunity to file objections pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). No such objections were filed.

Upon consideration of the Report and Recommendation, and upon the Court's independent examination of the file, the Court will adopt the Report and Recommendation and grant-in-part and deny-in-part the Motion to Dismiss.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED :

(1) The Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Wilson (Doc.

117) is adopted, confirmed, and approved in all respects and is made a part of this order for all purposes, including appellate review.

(2) The Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 76) is

GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART . (3) The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that Count VII

(Tortious Interference with Prospective Business Relations) is DISMISSED , without prejudice , to Plaintiff’s right to amend that claim. In all other respects, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED .

(4) Plaintiff is granted leave to file an amended complaint, that is consistent

with this order, within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of this order. Failure to file an amended complaint within the time provided will result in Count VII being dismissed.

DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on March 14, 2022.

Copies to:

The Honorable Thomas G. Wilson

Counsel of Record

Case Details

Case Name: Perma-Liner Industries, LLC v. D'Hulster
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Florida
Date Published: Mar 14, 2022
Docket Number: 8:21-cv-00715
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Fla.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.