History
  • No items yet
midpage
Perkins v. Stickney
132 Mass. 217
Mass.
1882
Check Treatment
Endicott, J.

Whether a witness who is called as an expert has the requisite qualifications and knowledge to enable him to testify, is a preliminary question for the court. The decision of this question is conclusive, unless it appears upon the evidence to have been erroneous, or to have been founded upon some error in law. Nunes v. Perry, 113 Mass. 274, 276. Commonwealth v. Sturtivant, 117 Mass. 122. In the case at bar, no such error is shown; on the contrary, it appears that the witness had no knowledge of the quality of the coal in question, except through the reports of his engineer. Exceptions overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Perkins v. Stickney
Court Name: Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Date Published: Jan 30, 1882
Citation: 132 Mass. 217
Court Abbreviation: Mass.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.