History
  • No items yet
midpage
Perine v. Swaine
1 Johns. Ch. 24
New York Court of Chancery
1814
Check Treatment
The Chancellor.

The rule is well settled, that the wife cannot answer, separately, without leave or order of the court. The husband is; her legal guardian and protector and if there were reasons for her answering separately, they ought to have been made known to the court, that it might judge of their force. Here is no evidence of the previous consent of the husband to the answer, and the rule is well calculated to prevent the wife from being misled.

Motion granted.

Case Details

Case Name: Perine v. Swaine
Court Name: New York Court of Chancery
Date Published: May 16, 1814
Citation: 1 Johns. Ch. 24
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.