History
  • No items yet
midpage
Perine v. Perine
175 So. 2d 71
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
1965
Check Treatment
PER CURIAM.

By this appeal the appellant, defendant-husband in the trial court, seeks review of an adverse final decree entered in a divorce proceeding. The only error preserved for review is the adjudication by the chancellor that certain jointly owned property of the parties and certain “bearer” securities belong to the wife.

The chancellor having found that the appellant at no time contributed any support to the family during the 14 years’ existence of the marriage; having found that the source of monies from which the acquisition of the assets was made possible came solely '.from the separate estate of the wife; we find no error in those features of the final decree here under review. See: Strauss v. Strauss, 148 Fla. 23, 3 So.2d 727; Lauderdale v. Lauderdale, Fla.App.1957, 96 So.2d 663;. Allen v. Allen, Fla.App.1960, 123 So. 2d 355; McFarland v. McFarland, Fla.App. 1961, 131 So.2d 749; Anderson v. Anderson, Fla.App.1963, 153 So.2d 24; Witlin v. Witlin, Fla.App.1963, 153 So.2d 70; 17 Fla.Jur., Husband and Wife, §§ 43, 44, 45.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Perine v. Perine
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: May 4, 1965
Citation: 175 So. 2d 71
Docket Number: No. 64-830
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.