History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peralli v. Pitkat
19 Conn. App. 803
Conn. App. Ct.
1989
Check Treatment
Per Curiam.

The plaintiff appeals from the trial court’s order imposing sanctions against her and requiring her to make weekly payments for child support and the sanctions. The plaintiff’s essential claim is that the court’s determination of her earning capacity was unsupported by the evidence. Our examination of the record indicates that there was ample evidence for the trial court to determine the plaintiff’s earning capacity. We will not retry the facts. Golfin v. Plymouth Industrial Development Corp. of Connecticut, Inc., 15 Conn. App. 804, 543 A.2d 287 (1988).

There is no error.

Case Details

Case Name: Peralli v. Pitkat
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Jun 21, 1989
Citation: 19 Conn. App. 803
Docket Number: 7395
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.