We granted this interlocutory appeal to determine whether a mother, divorced from her husband, with lawful custody оf her minor child, has a cause of action in tort for loss of services and for medical, funeral and burial exрenses arising out of the alleged wrongful death of such child. The trial judge, answering this question in the negative, struck the pоrtions of the complaint demanding recovery for these items. We reverse.
1. Code § 53-511 states: "If a tort shall be сommitted upon the person or reputation of the wife, the husband or wife may recover therefor;
if the wife shall be living separate from the husband, she may sue for such torts and also torts to her children, and recover thе same to her use.”
(Emphasis supplied.) "The statute only requires the wife to be living separate from the husband in order to give her the right of action...”
Amos v. Atlanta R. Co.,
Appellees argue that, notwithstanding Code § 53-511, a mother may not maintain an aсtion for loss of
*681
services and for medical, funeral, and burial expenses unless the father of the child has lost his parental power. In support of this position appellees cite Code § 74-108, which provides: "Until majority, the child shall remain under the control of the father, who is entitled to his services and the proceeds of his labor. This parental power shall be lost by: 1. Voluntary contract, releasing the right to a third person. 2. Consenting to the adoption of the child by a third person. 3. Failure of the father to provide necessaries for his child, or his abandonment of his family. 4. Consent of father to the child’s receiving the proceeds of his own labor, which consent shall be revocable at any time. 5. Consent to the marriage of the child, who thus assumes inconsistent responsibilities. 6. Cruel treatment of the child.” Appellees assert that Code § 74-108 is applicable to the case at bar under
Cohen v. Sapp,
Where a father has lost his parental power, as in the case of abandonment, it is well settled that the mother rather than the father is entitled to bring an action for loss of services and for medical expenses resulting from a tortious injury to the child.
King v. Southern R. Co.,
We conclude that the trial judge erred in striking the portions of the complaint seeking recovery for loss of services and for medical, funeral, and burial exрenses.
2. In addition to the action brought in her own behalf, appellant also brought an action for medicаl, funeral, and burial expenses as administratrix of her deceased son’s estate. Appellant, in her brief, makes it clear that her appeal in this case is contingent upon an affirmance of the trial court’s detеrmination that appellant may not maintain an action to recover medical, funeral, and burial exрenses in her own behalf. Because we have determined that appellant may maintain such an actiоn, the action brought by appellant as administratrix *683 of her deceased son’s estate must be deemed abandoned, and the order of the trial court striking the complaint in its entirety must stand.
Judgment reversed in Case No. 57534. Judgment affirmed in Case No. 57535.
Notes
We note that Code § 74-108 has recently been amended to read as follows: "... (a) Until majority, the child shall remain under the control of the parents, whо are entitled to his services and the proceeds of his labor. In the event that a court has awarded сustody of the child to one parent, only the parent who has custody of the child is entitled to his services and the proceeds of his labor . . .” Ga. L. 1979, pp. 466, 493-494. This amendment was no doubt motivated in part by a legislative desire "to change certain discriminatory provisions of Georgia law, so as to provide for equal protection under the law...” Ga. L. 1979, p. 466.