People v. ZuhlkePeople v. Zuhlke
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him, following a jury trial, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (
Here, it is undisputed that defendant knew that the other individuals in the vehicle in which he was a passenger planned to use the gun in an unlawful manner. The People presented evidence, including defendant‘s sworn statement, from which the jury could reasonably infer that defendant was a participant in the plan, from its inception, to acquire the gun and to locate an individual who would act as the gunman. Contrary to the contention of defendant, evidence of his flight from the scene of the shooting was admissible as circumstantial evidence of his consciousness of guilt (see People v Lendore, 36 AD3d 940 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 947 [2007]).
Present—Scudder, P.J., Smith, Carni, Pine and Gorski, JJ.