History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Yut Ling
74 Cal. 569
Cal.
1888
Check Treatment
The Court.

There was no misconduct of the jury in this case. It never separated.

When the jury went to view the premises, the judge of the court should have gone along with them. It was the right of defendant to have the judge accompany the jurors when they went to take this view. As the judge did not do this, the judgment and order denying a new trial must be reversed, and the cause remanded, that a new trial may be had.

Ordered accordingly..

Paterson, J., and McFarland, J., dissented.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Yut Ling
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Jan 25, 1888
Citation: 74 Cal. 569
Docket Number: No. 20344
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.