midpage

People v. YoungPeople v. Young

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Apr 19, 2012
Versions:94 A.D.3d 1291
942 N.Y.S.2d 379

Per Curiam. Respondent, who was admitted to practice by this Court in 1986, was suspended by this Court‘s order dated September 24, 2009 for failure to comply with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a (Matter of Attorneys in Violation of Judiciary Law § 468-a, 65 AD3d 1447 [2009]).

Respondent now requests reinstatement on the ground that he has complied with the attorney registration requirements of Judiciary Law § 468-a and the Rules of the Chief Administrator of the Courts (see 22 NYCRR part 118). Petitioner does not object to respondent‘s application.

Respondent‘s application is granted and he is ordered reinstated, effective immediately.

Peters, P.J., Mercure, Rose, Lahtinen and Spain, JJ., concur.

Ordered that respondent‘s application is granted; and it is further ordered that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Young
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Apr 19, 2012
Citations: 94 A.D.3d 1291; 942 N.Y.S.2d 379
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In