History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Young
48 N.Y.2d 995
NY
1980
Check Treatment
48 N.Y.2d 995 (1980)

The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v.
Jerry Young, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Argued December 11, 1979.
Decided January 3, 1980.

Arthur Birnbaum and Richard S. Fries for appellant.

Mario Merola, District Attorney (Steven J. Greenblatt and Alan D. Marrus of counsel), for respondent.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER concur in memorandum.

*996MEMORANDUM.

The order appealed from should be affirmed. Our examination of the record persuades us that there exists no basis for disturbing the factual finding made by Supreme Court and affirmed by the Appellate Division that the inculpatory statements had been voluntarily made by defendant following an effective waiver of his rights to counsel and to remain silent. Nor can we conclude that the trial court erred in denying defendant's requests for a mistrial based on peripheral references to another criminal act allegedly performed by the defendant, in light of the availability of less drastic means of alleviating whatever prejudice may have resulted. Indeed, in one instance the court instructed the jury to disregard the testimony, and in another instance the court indicated a willingness to consider such a request. Instead, defendant adhered to his unwarranted demand for a mistrial. Upon this appeal, defendant continues to insist that a mistrial was mandated. We disagree.

We have considered defendant's other contentions, and find them to be without merit.

Order affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Young
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 3, 1980
Citation: 48 N.Y.2d 995
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.