midpage

People v. WomackPeople v. Womack

New York Court of Appeals
Oct 21, 1997
Versions:

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed for reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (229 AD2d 304), noting additionally that the defendant’s appellate delay contention is not a matter properly presented to this Court (see, CPL 470.15 [1]; 470.35 [2] [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Titone, Bellacosa, Smith, Levine, Cipaeick and Wesley.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Womack
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Oct 21, 1997
Citations: 90 N.Y.2d 974; 688 N.E.2d 1034; 665 N.Y.S.2d 952; 1997 N.Y. LEXIS 4804
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In