People v. WolvenPeople v. Wolven
- Reporters:
- ,
- Before:
- Chambers
The defendant‘s contention that his plea of guilty was not entered knowingly, voluntarily, or intelligently is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Fernandez, 103 AD3d 813 [2013]; People v Elufe, 102 AD3d 982 [2013]). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant‘s guilty plea was knowing, voluntary, and intelligent (see People v Elufe, 102 AD3d at 982; see generally People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Harris, 61 NY2d 9, 17 [1983]). Skelos, J.P., Chambers, Sgroi and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.