midpage

People v. WinfieldPeople v. Winfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Feb 24, 2009
Versions:59 A.D.3d 747
874 N.Y.S.2d 225

Ordered that the order is affirmed.

The Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (L 2004, ch 738; hereinafter the 2004 DLRA) established a new sentencing structure for laws which were enacted in 1973 and were commonly referred to as the Rockefeller Drug Laws (see L 1973, ch 276, § 19). The 2004 DLRA became effective January 13, 2005, and was to be applied prospectively (L 2004, ch 738, § 41 [d-1]). A subsequent enactment of the Legislature, effective October 29, 2005, retroactively extended the revised sentencing provisions of the 2004 DLRA to certain qualified inmates who previously had been convicted of class A-II felonies (L 2005, ch 643, § 1).

The County Court, after a hearing, providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant‘s motion to be resentenced. The defendant has an extensive prior criminal history dating back to 1982 and was subjected to disciplinary action 53 times while incarcerated. Under these circumstances, substantial justice dictated that the motion be denied (see L 2005, ch 643, § 1; People v Flores, 50 AD3d 1156 [2008]; People v Sanders, 36 AD3d 944, 946 [2007]). Skelos, J.P., Dillon, Angiolillo and Eng, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Winfield
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Feb 24, 2009
Citations: 59 A.D.3d 747; 874 N.Y.S.2d 225
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
Log In