History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Windham
42 A.D.3d 441
N.Y. App. Div.
2007
Check Treatment

Appeal by the defendant from an order of the County Court, Suffolk County (Hudson, J.), dated August 30, 2004, which, after a hearing, designated him a level three sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s *442assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738 [1967]; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631 [1976]; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606 [1979]). Crane, J.E, Santucci, Florio, Dillon and Balkin, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Windham
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Jul 10, 2007
Citation: 42 A.D.3d 441
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.