People v. WilsonPeople v. Wilson
Defendant‘s challenge to the voluntariness of his plea is unpreserved (see People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]), and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. As an alternative holding, we reject it on the merits. “The court was not obligated to inquire about a possible intoxication defense, because defendant said nothing about intoxication in his plea allocution itself, regardless of what he may have said on other occasions” (People v Ortega, 70 AD3d 416, 417 [1st Dept 2010], lv denied 15 NY3d 808 [2010]).
Defendant made a valid waiver of his right to appeal (see
Concur—Andrias, J.P., Friedman, Moskowitz, DeGrasse and Feinman, JJ.