People v. WilsonPeople v. Wilson
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The record demonstrates that the defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737 [2006]; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248 [2006]; People v Wright, 34 AD3d 940 [2006]). The defendant‘s valid waiver forecloses appellate review of his challenge to the Supreme Court‘s suppression determination (see People v Kemp, 94 NY2d 831 [1999]; People v Peoples, 34 AD3d 503 [2006]; People v Campbell, 24 AD3d 463 [2005]). Mastro, J.P., Krausman, Fisher and Lifson, JJ., concur.