People v. Wilson

Feb 1, 2017
2014-02492
Versions:147 A.D.3d 793
45 N.Y.S.3d 800
2017 NY Slip Op 673
2017 NY Slip Op 00673

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621 [1983]), the People adduced legally sufficient evidence to support the defendant‘s conviction of assault in the first degree under Penal Law § 120.10 (3) beyond a reasonable doubt, as the evidence of the defendant‘s conduct supported a finding of depraved indifference (see People v Suarez, 6 NY3d 202, 212 [2005]; People v Nelligan, 135 AD3d 1075, 1077-1078 [2016]; People v Nunez, 51 AD3d 1398, 1399 [2008]). Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence.

The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his contention that the verdict is repugnant (see People v Carter, 7 NY3d 875, 876 [2006]; People v Brooks, 139 AD3d 1391, 1394 [2016]; People v Summerville, 138 AD3d 897, 898 [2016]). In any event, the verdict was not repugnant (see Matter of Suarez v Byrne, 10 NY3d 523, 541 [2008]; People v Trappier, 87 NY2d 55, 59 [1995]; Matter of Shalick M., 133 AD3d 413 [2015]).

The defendant‘s remaining contention is without merit.

Rivera, J.P., Roman, Duffy and Brathwaite Nelson, JJ., concur.