People v. WilliamsPeople v. Williams
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The County Court properly denied the defendant‘s request for a missing witness charge. A missing witness charge is appropriate where it is shown that “the uncalled witness is knowledgeable about a material issue upon which evidence is already in the case; that the witness would naturally be expected to provide noncumulative testimony favorable to the party who has not called him, and that the witness is available to such party” (People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424, 427 [1986]). The People demonstrated that they exerted diligent efforts to locate the uncalled witness without success (see People v Aguirre, 201 AD2d 485, 486 [1994]).
Upon the exercise of our factual review power (see
The defendant‘s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit.
Ritter, J.P., Florio, Miller and Dillon, JJ., concur.