Motion to amend remittitur denied upon the ground that, since it was found that defendant-appellant was not an indigent person, no substantial constitutional question was directly involved upon the appeal. [See 18 N Y 2d 936.]
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.
