People v. WilcoxPeople v. Wilcox
—Appeal from a judgment of Ontario County Court (Doran, J.), entered May 1, 2001, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of, inter alia, criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts).
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of two counts of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]), and one count each of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fourth degree (§ 220.09 [1]), unlawful possession of marijuana (§ 221.05) and resisting arrest (§ 205.30). Defendant was sentenced as a second felony offender to concurrent terms of imprisonment, the longest of which is 6 to 12 years. We reject the contention of defendant that he was denied his statutory right to a speedy trial. Although defendant was not tried until approximately 10 months after the commencement of the criminal action, a portion of the delay resulted from defendant’s requests for a preliminary hearing (see People v Pressley,
Contrary to defendant’s further contention, County Court properly determined that the police had the requisite reasonable suspicion to support the stop of the vehicle in which defendant was a passenger and probable cause to arrest defendant. The vehicle was first seen by an officer patrolling the area near a construction site that had been the subject of several recent burglar alarms. The vehicle was parked illegally and, as the patrol car approached, the driver of the vehicle crouched in the vehicle, thereby avoiding eye contact with the officer. The officer called in the license plate of the vehicle and
As the court properly determined, the officer had reasonable suspicion to justify the initial stop of the vehicle in which defendant was a passenger (see People v Hollman,