People v. WellsPeople v. Wells
- Reporters:
- , ,
When the Supreme Court explained the defendant‘s waiver of his right to appeal to him, it improperly conflated the right to appeal with the rights automatically forfeited by a guilty plea. Accordingly, the waiver of the right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256-257 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133, 137 [2014]; People v Bond, 109 AD3d 481 [2013]). Nevertheless, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Eng, P.J., Balkin, Hall, Cohen and Maltese, JJ., concur.