History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Watson
931 N.Y.2d 231
N.Y. App. Div.
2011
Check Treatment

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v VINCENT RODRIGUEZ, Appellant.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York

May 24, 2011

931 NYS2d 230

Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

The resentencing proceeding imposing a term of postrelease supervision was neither barred by double jeopardy nor otherwise unlawful (see People v Lingle, 16 NY3d 621 [2011]). We have no authority to revisit defendant‘s prison sentence on this appeal (see id. at 635). Concur—Gonzalez, P.J., Mazzarelli, Sweeny, Abdus-Salaam and Román, JJ.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Watson
Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Date Published: Oct 20, 2011
Citation: 931 N.Y.2d 231
Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Log In