People v. WardPeople v. Ward
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Dillon, J.), rendered November 6, 1997, convicting him of assault in the second degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
The defendant’s contention that Penal Law § 70.08 (3) (c) violates the Equal Protection Clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions is without merit. “ ‘The equal protection clause does not mandate absolute equality of treatment but merely prescribes that, absent a fundamental interest or suspect classification, a legislative classification be rationally related to a legitimate State purpose’ ” (People v Walker,
The Legislature’s determination to increase the minimum sentence for a persistent violent felony offender for a period of ten years, at which point the lower minimum would go back into effect, has a rational basis. The legislative scheme provides an opportunity to study and evaluate whether the increased sentences have the intended effect of lowering the rate of violent crime and a deadline by which the impact of the statute must be assessed.
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Altman, J. P., Friedmann, McGinity and Luciano, JJ., concur.