People v. Wallington, 77 Cal. App. 366

THE COURT.

[1] It appears from the face of the ‍​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‍application for a stay of execution of the judgment under section 1243 of the Penal Code that the appeal from the judgment is abortive ‍​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‍and that the order made after judgment necessarily must be affirmed. The appeal from the judgment was not taken in time. (Pen. ‍​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‍Code, sec. 1239; Starr v. Superior Court, 23 Cal.App. 670 [139 P. 241].) [2] The sufficiency of the indictment could not be questioned on the motion made in ‍​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‍the lower court to set aside the judgment after it had become final. (People v. Mooney, 178 Cal. 525 [174 P. 325]; People v. Reid, 195 Cal. 249 [36 A.L.R. ‍​‌‌​‌​‌​​‌‌​​​​‌‌‌‌​​​‌​​‌‌​‌​​‌​​‌​​‌​‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​​​​‌‌‌‌​‌‌​​​​​‌​​​​‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌​‌‌‌‌‌‌‌​​‌‌‌​‌‍1345, 232 P. 457].)

The application for stay of execution is denied.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Wallington

Court Name: California Court of Appeal

Date Published: Apr 7, 1926

Citations: 77 Cal. App. 366; 246 P. 815; 1926 Cal. App. LEXIS 289; Docket No. 1372.

Docket Number: Docket No. 1372.

Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.