People v. WalkerPeople v. Walker
—Judgment, Supreme
The court properly exercised its discretion in permitting the People to introduce defendant’s videotaped confession in which two references to the deceased having committed robberies in the area were redacted. The redactions did not violate the rule of completeness (see, People v Dlugash,
The court’s instruction to the jury that the term “initial aggressor” (see,
We perceive no basis for reduction of sentence. Defendant’s claim that his sentence was based on improper criteria is unpreserved and we decline to review it in the interest of justice. Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Andrias, Lerner, Saxe and Buckley, JJ.