People v. Voltaire, 112 A.D.3d 601

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

Contrary to the defendant‘s contention, under the circumstances of this case, including the fact that the defendant and three codefendants took turns brutally raping and sodomizing the then-19-year-old victim, the Supreme Court properly determined that there were aggravating factors not adequately taken into account by the SORA guidelines (see People v Henry, 91 AD3d 927 [2012]; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d 112, 121, 123 [2011]; People v Ray, 86 AD3d 435 [2011]; People v Rios, 57 AD3d 501, 502 [2008]; People v Miller, 48 AD3d 774, 774-775 [2008]; People v Joslyn, 27 AD3d 1033, 1034-1035 [2006]). Upon making such a determination, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the People‘s application for an upward departure (see People v Henry, 91 AD3d at 927; People v Wyatt, 89 AD3d at 121, 123). Rivera, J.P., Hall, Roman and Miller, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Voltaire

Court Name: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Date Published: Dec 4, 2013

Citations: 112 A.D.3d 601; 975 N.Y.S.2d 891

Court Abbreviation: N.Y. App. Div.