People v. VelezPeople v. Velez
Appeal from judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), rendered June 29, 2000, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of nine years, held in abeyance, and the matter remanded to the Supreme Court for a reconstruction hearing as to whether defendant knowingly, intelligently and voluntarily waived his right to attend robing room conferences with prospective jurors.
Prior to the commencement of jury selection, the trial court stated in the robing room, in the absence of defendant, that: “I have been informed by Defense Counsel that his client has chosen to remain outside in the courtroom during the preliminary screening. Is that correct?” In response, defense counsel stated: “That’s correct.” Subsequently, the prospective jurors were questioned individually by the trial court and counsel in the robing room in the absence of defendant, and matters were explored that would require a defendant’s presence or waiver thereof.
It is well settled that a defendant’s waiver of his rights under People v Antommarchi (