midpage

People v. ValerioPeople v. Valerio

New York Court of Appeals
Nov 28, 2000
Versions:95 N.Y.2d 924
744 N.E.2d 136
721 N.Y.S.2d 601
2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3553

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determinations regarding the scope of the initial stop, the questioning of defendant about the clothing in his trunk, defendant’s consent to search the vehicle, the inventory search and the use of a drug-sniffing dog to search the vehicle all involve mixed questions of law and fact. Inasmuch as those determinations are supported by evidence in the record, they are beyond further review by this Court.

Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Smith, Levine, Ciparick, Wesley and Rosenblatt concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed in a memorandum.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Valerio
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 28, 2000
Citations: 95 N.Y.2d 924; 744 N.E.2d 136; 721 N.Y.S.2d 601; 2000 N.Y. LEXIS 3553
Court Abbreviation: N.Y.
Log In