People v. TylerPeople v. Tyler
In 1997, after defendant was convicted of rape in the third degree (People v Tyler, 260 AD2d 796 [1999], lv denied 93 NY2d 980 [1999]), he was required to register as a sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (see
Defendant’s sole contention on this appeal is that County Court should have assigned substitute counsel to represent him on his motion to withdraw his plea. For the reasons stated in People v Tyler (130 AD3d 1383 [2015] [appeal No. 106719, decided herewith]), we find that County Court was not required to assign new counsel to represent defendant prior to deciding the motion to withdraw the plea.
McCarthy, J.P., Egan Jr. and Devine, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.