People v. TurtonPeople v. Turton
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Demarest, J.), rendered October 19, 1993, convicting him of assault in the second degree (two counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
A court in its charge need not marshal all the evidence, but must "state the material legal principles applicable to the particular case” (
Here, it cannot be said that the defendant was deprived of a fair trial. The court marshaled the evidence in an even-handed manner and did not give undue emphasis to the People’s evidence or theories. In addition, the court instructed the jurors that nothing the court stated was evidence, and that the jurors were "the exclusive judges of the facts, and * * * what I may
The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Joy, JJ., concur.