History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Turner
18 N.Y.2d 683
NY
1966
Check Treatment

Motion to amend remittitur granted. Return of remittitur requested and, when returned, it will be amended by adding thereto the following: Upon the appeal herein there were presented and necessarily passed upon questions under the Constitution of the United States, as follows: Appellants contended that (1) their convictions violated the due process guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment because they were based in whole or part on acts which were not charged in the complaint; (2). their convictions violated their constitutional rights of free speech and free assembly, and (3) their convictions under subdivisions 2, 3 and 4 of section 722 of the Penal Law violated the due process guarantee of the Fourteenth Amendment because of vagueness. The Court of Appeals held that appellants’ constitutional rights were in no way violated. [See 17 N Y 2d 829.]

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Turner
Court Name: New York Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 7, 1966
Citation: 18 N.Y.2d 683
Court Abbreviation: NY
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.