People v. TrotterPeople v. Trotter
—Order unanimously reversed on the law, motion to suppress denied and matter remitted to Erie County Court for further proceedings on indictment. Memorandum: County Court erred in granting defendant’s motion to suppress a gun seized from defendant in a bedroom located at 526 Monroe Street, Buffalo. Defendant failed to meet his initial burden of establishing that he had standing "by demonstrating a personal legitimate expectation of privacy” (People v Whitfield,
Here, the sole witness at the suppression hearing was the ar
Thus, the record is insufficient as a matter of law to support the conclusion of the court that defendant has standing to challenge the seizure of the gun. Defendant’s affidavit was not admitted into evidence and it served only to "raise standing as an issue of fact and avoid summary judgment under CPL 710.60 (3)” (People v Whitfield, supra, at 906). (Appeal from Order of Erie County Court, McCarthy, J. — Suppress Evidence.) Present — Pine, J. P., Fallon, Wesley, Doerr and Davis, JJ.